A practice built around one problem

When the practice started, financial fraud was largely domestic and largely analogue. Recovery meant a bank, a police station and a court, usually in the same city. That model still shapes how most institutions handle fraud reports today — and it is precisely why modern cases fall through the gaps.

A single online fraud now routinely touches four or five jurisdictions before anyone notices anything is wrong. The victim is in one country, the receiving account in a second, the intermediary licensed in a third, the exchange or corporate shell in a fourth. Each institution sees a fragment. Each concludes, reasonably, that it is someone else’s problem.

We built the practice around closing that gap: one file, one case officer, and parallel filings into every jurisdiction that has a stake. Tracing establishes where the funds actually went. The evidence file makes the case actionable without the recipient having to fill in blanks. Coordinated filing means no authority reads the matter in isolation.

The last part is the hardest to say and the most important. A substantial proportion of losses are not recoverable, and people who have already been defrauded are then targeted a second time by firms that promise otherwise. We give a free written assessment precisely so that the answer — including "no" — costs nothing.